SLA and DLP are the two most common processes for resin 3D printing. Resin 3D printers are known for producing high-accuracy, isotropic, and watertight prototypes and parts in a range of advanced materials with fine features and smooth surface finish. Resin 3D printers like SLA and DLP offer some of the finest Z resolutions—thinnest layers—of all 3D printing processes and users can normally choose from a range of layer height options between 25-300 microns.
The difference is the light source. DLP 3D printers use a digital projector screen to flash an image of a layer across the entire platform, curing all points simultaneously. Since the projector is a digital screen, the image of each layer is composed of square pixels, resulting in a layer formed from small rectangular bricks called voxels.
SLA vs DLP
Resolution:
DLP: There’s a direct trade-off between resolution and build volume. The resolution depends on the projector, which defines the number of pixels/voxels available. If one moves the projector closer to the optical window, the pixels get smaller, which increases the resolution, but limits the available build area. SLA: Inherently more scalable, SLA 3D printer’s build volume is completely independent of the resolution of the print. A single print can be any size and any resolution at any location within the build area.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihR9SX7dgRo&&t=1s
Continuous liquid interface production (CLIP) is a proprietary 3D printing method patented in 2014 by Carbon3D (formerly EiPi Systems). It is a 3D printing technology that falls under the general process of vat polymerization and shares many similarities with the older stereolithography (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP) printing methods. CLIP is unique from SLA and DLP as it is a truly continuous process that “grows” parts, removing the discrete steps of previous printing methods. CLIP’s innovation lies in its oxygen-permeable membrane that creates a dead zone underneath the part, allowing for continuous curing as the part is drawn out of the resin. Instead of using a layer-by-layer approach
The difference between CLIP and DLP is that, though they have comparable resolutions, the CLIP process smoothly blurs the layers together and eliminates the so-called voxelated effect that is typically seen in DLP prints > leading to less processing work and faster build times.
https://youtu.be/ihR9SX7dgRo?t=1s
Printing speeds within the previous processes are limited by the heat buildup from the exothermic polymerization process, thus limiting the ultimate size of the printed object. HARP use a pumped, nonreactive fluorinated oil to act as the dead layer that removes heat during polymerization. This approach allows for both speedup and scale-up of the printing process.
The oil is also filtered to remove fragments of plastic generated during the process, which can scatter light and decrease the resolution of the printing. As with other continuous printing systems, UV light enters the tank through its transparent base.
Because HARP does not require an oxygen dead layer, it is compatible with both oxygen-sensitive and -insensitive ink chemistries, increasing the scope of applicable resins and resulting materials.
38 cm x 61 cm x 76 cm lattice structure in 105minutes - the highest throughput achieved by any stereolithography system
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSkvJizACfc&
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/366/6463/360
Two-Photon polymerization uses the constructive interference of two-photons of light to initiate polymerization. With this scheme, each photo has half the energy needed to initiate. This is the opposite of single-photon exciting, which mostly hardens where the laser is focused but has some bleed because the photon leaving the focus still harden the resin. With two-photon, the probability of initiation depends on the probability of two separate photons absorbing into the photo initiator. This absorbance nonlinearity means it is essentially only the exact spot where the light if focused that the resin hardens. While extremely precise, this method is extremely slow, the printers cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, and only small objects can be printed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZifB2aQDDM&&t=827s
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12360-w
Distinguishing from previous stereolithography processes that fabricate structures layer by layer, volumetric stereolithography produces 3D objects with the formation of 3D volumes as a unit operation. This system works by taking a 3D object, breaking that into slices of it viewed at different angles. That image is projected into the rotating resin vat. A key element they are using here is oxygen inhibition. When the photo initiator is broken down to free radicals, oxygen will quickly quench the radicals until the oxygen is depleted. Once depleted, then the cross linking occurs. The researchers use this “cross linking threshold” as a way to selectively build up energy in the vat, allowing for area specific cross linking.
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/363/6431/1075
This work is the advanced version of DLP. It can generate prints 10x more detailed than CAL and with 4-5 times higher print speeds that Two-Photon polymerization. To do this, it uses a photo initiator that requires two colors of light to initiate polymerization. The first beam of light is generated by a laser “sheet” that goes through the cross section of the print. The second team is generated by a projector (similar to DLP). Each layer is build by moving the laser sheet through the tank.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-3029-7
In general, the difficulty with resin technique for bioprinting is that 1) once cross linked, it is hard to get cells into the matrix evenly and often the matrix can be quite weak 2) the resin precursor can often be toxic to the cells.
https://n-e-r-v-o-u-s.com/blog/?p=8433