For this week, I start with characterizing the laser cutter’s focus, power, speed, rate, kerf, and joint clearance by testing
different combination of the cutting speed and power. The test range for parameters is Power: 10-60 and Speed:10-60.
This is the layout we use for testing:
Based on the results of the first test, we came to the following conclusion: the stronger the power, or the slower the speed,
the deeper the cutting depth and width. At the same time, we also noticed that the dotted line contour of each testing group was
not cut as we expected. Compared with the solid line under the same speed and power Settings, the dotted line was not affected
by power and speed when being cut. I am not sure about the actual reason for this, but probably because the dotted line is too
fragmented.
In the second test, we want to verify the previous results again. We compared the four exemplified groups (10p 10s,
60p 10s, 10p 60s and 60p 60s). This time, the results were more intuitive. The kerf width of the 10p 10s group was approximately
between 0.5mm and 0.8mm, while the kerf width of the 60p 10s group was wider between 0.8mm and 1mm.
I am interested in how 2D pieces
can be transformed into adaptive 3D objects, thus I came up with an idea of folding an adaptive truncated octahedron.Truncated
octahedron is a very interesting geometry, consisting of six squares and eight regular hexagon faces. Because of the somewhat
symmetrical nature of each face, it is also a permutohedron that can fill the entire three-dimensional space independently.
The structure itself is reproducible, quantifiable, stackable, and can be unrolled as a spatial geometry into 2d shapes and quickly
assembled by folding. Thus, I would like to see the application of this stable and efficient crystalline structure in architecture,
especially in prefabricated unit construction.
My precedents:
My design process in rhino and grasshopper: