HTMA Week 4: Bocchi and Fumo
Published: 2023-10-043D Printing
This week’s focus is on 3D printing and scanning. Since I do digital sculpting in my free time, I thought it’d be cool to print one of my models. Due to material and time constraints placed on us for this week, I chose a model that is on the simpler side and wouldn’t require much material to capture its details:
I had split the model such that the hair and hair cubes are printed separately to avoid printing a huge amount of unnecessary supports.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/674c0/674c06941600d94d5b8b2569be1af3a60ea72d20" alt="After print"
For printing, because it has dissolvable supports and I don’t want to deal with getting supports out of tiny crevices (especially behind the hair), I chose the Stratasys printer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/344e5/344e5f97325a76d47624f4d57986030e9ecc094f" alt="After print"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78316/78316ffda94c49ef31aeac714fc2a42415a17ad7" alt="After print"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef2d1/ef2d1e6f09de68fcf7dadd7ce24cf91d649d4cc4" alt="After print"
The print took about 6-7 hours. However, of the way the support was built, the ends of the hair on both sides moved mid-print, causing that area to fail.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbae2/cbae21e282bb2a8803352792d9e86509e3ac868f" alt="Failed hair"
I also did not have the foresight to make the hair strand thicker at its stem, so it broke off after a while. I used superglue to glue it back on.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c84cd/c84cdb9ac3665edf572b7773bc6c49f7ee3aea3d" alt="Parts"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9aeb6/9aeb642e148f036c803cf4e050bb67c7adef019a" alt="Parts"
In the end, it turned out pretty good.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2122f/2122fa5be8ed3c2e62123eb235a207691accba52" alt="Failed hair"
3D Scanning
For my 3D scan, I decided to use AliceVision to scan my fumo plush doll. I tried a simple workflow of recording a video going around the doll, and just extracting the frames via ffmpeg
and feeding all the frames into AliceVision. The whole process took about 3 hours in total for 957 images, and the results are frankly not great.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ca1b/2ca1be5c157e08511b6700884f8a86269cb05a1d" alt="Bad Scan"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91e9c/91e9c353689c845d56a6c3a423301e92eac90c3b" alt="Bad Scan"
It seems that more data doesn’t necessarily mean a better scan. Next time I’ll try to just take a bunch of good pictures instead of going with the lazier route, since other people have way more successful scans of their objects with fewer pictures.