This week we were assigned to make something big.
I went through a number of designs for this project, first landing on a leaning bookshelf which is something I've dreamed about having for months now. Ultimately upon designing this I felt it was too simple/linear and that CNC was not the appropriate method to fabricate this piece. In this train of thought I designed a piece which could virtually only be done with a CNC. A parametrically-designed modular assembly of an undulating wall piece.
My new design took a lofted surface working off the energy within the corner of the room and fragments it into triangular modules with apertures expanding towards the window. The idea was to play with modules, undulating form, and a gradient of apertures.
Originally I laid out all the pieces according to which edges would be beveled for the connecting joints. This involved a long process of exploding the mesh, converting to NURBS, lofting surfaces, rotating depending on which side was being beveled than selecting containment curves for beveled edges. After doing all this I was told thees regions were likely too small to be super noticeable. I considered this and also feedback from friends whom upon seeing the file kept thinking the shapes were three dimensional and beind dissappointed when I told them they were flat panels I ultimately scrapped the bevelling, re-rotated all shapes to be face up and re-modelled the forms so there was a slight slope assending toward the aperture of each module. The material I had was only 3/8" thick so I decided to slope the surface for 1/4" and leave 1/8" for connections.
Setting up the file in MasterCAM (what the GSD requires) took me ages (3 full days). This is due to the fact that MasterCAM has a STEEP learning curve, and that each time I submitted a new TA looked it over and had new comments and the file additionally crashed right before I was about to cut and we had to redo EVERYTHING. Quite a pain, but I do feel thoroughly conditioned now that I'm through with this experience.
One TA noticed that because the starting point of the inner cut-outs was placed at the corners the lead in angle was actually cutting into the piece I wanted to keep. I realized this would be bad so I had to manually readjust every single start point for each chain on the inner curves.
There was a fair deal of post-processing involved, and could have been done even more rigorously, but I was in a time crunch and simply wanted a proof of concept level of finish. The tab mistake resulted in thick tabs which were a challenge to remove, and the depth must not have been set with enough excess because a thin layer kept all the pieces from coming apart and had to be cut out one by one - quite frustrating.
Ultimately I will need to get more wood to finish up the piece. I will get a higher quality to avoid the de-lamination, the TAs recommended looking for a grade Boulter Plywoods calls "void free" Baltic Birch. I also think it would look much nicer with a finer laminatio to get a denser striation, and possibly a bit thicker of a material to have a more dramatic slope. I think this was a great first attempt and I look forward to finishing the installation!